COSVRY INVESTMENTS

COSVRY INVESTMENTS

Thursday, April 23, 2015

REORGANIZATIONAL SUCCESSION THOUGHT PROCESS/DECISION - UPDATED


Introduction:
The focus of this post is to document the departure of one individual from a critical role and correspondingly introduce her replacement to lead the division as it embarks on the mission it was destined to fulfill as a “flagship” product’s “parent” in an environment where meaningful goals are fostered and uplifted.

Background Details:
With this announcement, it becomes clear that a special individual will not be a part of “Holding Base” organizational structure in anyway and she, Elin Nordegrin will be offered a role of a different kind to be revealed later. As a result of this action, the position of REGIONAL MANAGER - COSVRY INVESTMENTS (RM - CI) has become vacant temporarily and has to be reassigned to another. Immediately, two notable individuals come to mind, both of whom in my opinion can “hit the ground running", and they are, my very long standing friend whom was previously considered for and offered a position managing one of the previous organization’s concept CFWF, sections. She is none other than Denise Maddox, formerly of Pennsylvania and now, New Jersey, who is a very capable and skilled banker by profession, who early on recognized that my earlier business approach, (which was shelved for the new “Holding Base” approach), would not be very cost competitive and would be very unlikely to achieve financial success in its form. The other leading candidate is also a very longtime friend and in her case, a former track training colleague who unlike me made track and field, at which she was a very skilled competitor (in the days immediately prior to and following the completion of my secondary school years in the country of my birth, Barbados). She is none other than the very gifted Lorna Davis who could outrun many of the guys that competed in track and field at that time and as a result, parted with the shores of her island home approximately five (5) or more years prior to my leaving after being offered a scholarship and accepting it to study and continue training in the US, in the hopes of becoming a track and field “star” athlete. Lorna is now a resident of and resides in New York. On the other hand, I would later leave my homeland in 1978 to pursue my technical studies in New York and lost track of her as I concentrated on a different career, having long since concluded that track and field would not be life’s profession for me unlike the extremely gifted Lorna. However, in making my decision, I had to make the very tough choice of whom in my opinion would make the better business manager and even though Lorna would become a business major as her choice of studies, the position will be offered to my long-time banking friend Denise Maddox, who will bring her strong financial skills to this critically important division to ensure that it’s managed in a sound financial manner while making the tough decisions needed to ensure that success is realized giving the directive outlined in the post
REORGANIZATIONAL UPDATE/DIRECTIVE - UPDATED/AMENDED. However, Lorna will not be forgotten as the “Holding Base” organization approach is completely filled out.

Conclusion:
In my long-time friend Denise at the helm, a strong sense of financial accountability can be expected to be placed on the COSVRY INVESTMENTS as well as all the Proprietorships business operations, which will complement and support the Directive given in the earlier above post, ensuring that unacceptable conduct, which translates into financial inefficiency, will not be tolerated with the guidance given “life” by the “Directive”. Please join me in welcoming Denise to this section where great things can be expected from my long-time friend who will ensure that the goals of the Proprietorship are realized through this “flagship” product.

James F. Brazant
Proprietor
Conservery/Cosvry/ClChs Bakery
4/23/2015

6 comments:

  1. Retaliation against plant workers who are knowledgeable about what happened to actual plant records that were disposed of (ILLEGALLY destroyed) in open defiance of 10 CFR CRITERIA as documented in the Footnote in the post WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE GEESE IS ALSO GOOD FOR THE WIRELESS CARNDERS - EDITED/UPDATED & AMENDED, Is NOT the path to achieve "legitimacy” for impostors claiming to be originals. Please note: the most updated version of this comment, as well as all available links, photos, etc., are available on the COMMENTS (2015) Page.

    ReplyDelete
  2. To the girl I choose to remember as the very “sharp” dresser who was as personally confident about her abilities as anyone else and as a result, was very skilled in her area of expertize, who when it was time to take action did so. Let no one take what you have to offer for granted because you have much to give in the appropriate environment where you will be appreciated and that is why you were considered for and offered the very, very responsible position in the Proprietorship. In the Conservery “Holding Base” business model approach in general and in the Cosvry Investments section, in particular, your skills will be appreciated as you assist in helping to achieve all the critical goals outlined, who will in my opinion, will become a role model for others to aspire to.

    To digress:
    Take time to remember the contribution of one of the most successful US presidents in my opinion, who while he was in office was denigrated and made fun of the so called Capitol Hill “experts” and “think tanks” who made fun of anyone who as not of the “right standing”. However, when recorded history is researched, and honestly evaluated it will show that President Carter made one of the most significant contributions, if not the most significant to the Middle East peace effort as any President in the history of this Country. However, while in office, he was not appreciated because he often neither told people the things they wanted to hear nor did he “sugar-coat” it (the facts), since it was far from what the public wanted to hear in bad economic times, which marked his tenure as did a very questionable “Embassy/hostage take-over crisis” that just so happened to end “coincidentally” on the day he left orfice.

    To resume:
    Therefore, never shy away from putting your best “foot” forward in the way only you can, and you will be appreciated and rewarded by the Proprietorship when you take the helm of a very important Division as only you can in your own capable style, and just as you were credited with being able to recognize early on that the original Cosvry organizational model was not capable of achieving the financial goals desired; you will be recognized for all the successes you achieve as Cosvry is taken from idea to the investment business model known for its outstanding investment “vehicles”.
    Please Note: the most updated version of all comments as well as the available links and photos etc., are available on the COMMENTS (2015) Page.

    ReplyDelete
  3. COMMENT
    Those types who have no respect for the time-honored Processes that have served this Country well since its founding, should bear in mind that just because they show disdain for the rights of others and circumvent these in situations in order to achieve much by doing very little that's honorable, that the resources of James F. Brazant dba Conservery does not belong to any indovidual(s) but me as the post THE LAUNCHING OF THE INITIAL CONSERVERY WEBSITE – UPDATED, so clearly depicts. Just as carried out throughout my professional career as the above linked Experience Summary depicts, as the many witnesses included on this Blogs posts and even included the comments above; which most still have to come to realize that the then Conservery website as well as all its assets, are the property of no other individual but me, (as this Blog’s posts clearly depict). Those who have abscounded with my Proprietorship’s resources should realize by now that nothing implemented “today” will change historical events and transform a bunch of “highly disrespecful uindividuals” into being the owners of my Proprietorship’s property (resources). Therefore, when those who have acted improperly for the purpose of evading the correct order, alter their current path and restore what was not theirs to confiscate and “hold” illegally in the first place; at that time the State’s process (for indicating earned income received), as indicated in the email communication below, will be complied with.
    Please NOTE: the most updated form of all comments as well as all links, photos, etc. is on the COMMENTS (2015) Page.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment, which is being posted in two (2) contains my email communication with the State of Iowa Department of Revenue regarding the status of my Proprietorship's missing revenue.
    Part 1 is posted below:

    Gmail James F Brazant
    March, 2015 Iowa Withholding Tax Quarterly Returns for Conservery, Cosvry & ClChs Bakery - Follow-up

    James F Brazant Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 12:23 AM
    To: Iowa Department of Revenue

    This complete update of my earlier email response to your communication dated June 04, 2015 and June 08, 2015 for my Proprietorships; Conservery, Cosvry & ClChs Bakery with Permit/Account Nos. 80-0700798-002/990261104, 80-0700798-003/990261105 and 80-0700798-004/990261106 respectively; is untended to document for the record, the extenuating that exists with regards my ability to complete the State Business Permit Processes, as required. My previous email communication with your Office dated April 9, 2015 indicated that circumstances beyond my control had impeded my ability to ethically complete the State permitting process as required for all businesses. Since the conditions as described have not been altered, this impasse remains and this is unfortunate because I am still unable to ensure that all mail indented to arrive at either of my business/personal ONLY mail addresses (and containing funds owed by for example the Coca Cola Corporation and paid via check), actually arrive as intended. These addresses to, which ALL my Conservery/personal mail should be directed are 5249 N Park Place NE, #372, Cedar Rapids, IA 52402-6210 or P.O. Box 11292, Cedar Rapids, IA 52410-1292. Since I am unable to validate that all mail intended, arrive as required, I cannot in good faith complete the business permitting process that requires the revenue made and by default received by the business be indicated accurately. However, since some questionable activity with regards the mail receipts for my business has denied me the ability to validate these details and I cannot keep requesting that the Coca Cola Corporation send a new check, because this is the second occasion that this payment had to be resent due to non receipt of the funds (check mailed to Conservery) not being received by me the intended recipient (as the Proprietor of Conservery). As a result, I have concluded that a definite pattern exists when it comes to my ability to conduct business unimpeded as any other proprietor and/or entity has the right to do as guaranteed by the Constitution.
    It is therefore incorrect to simply indicate that I am not interested in continuing the referenced Permits/Accounts; to the contrary, the funds being awaited (to the tune of approximately $16,000,000.00) are the basis for a major expansion of my business with Conservery serving as the “Holding Base” Proprietorship from, which the other Proprietorships (Cosvry and ClCh's Bakery) are operated as subsidiaries with the only business activity carried out by Conservery, being efficiency (or root cause) evaluations. The Cosvry Investments Blog Page documents the “Holding Base” business model approach in part, in postings such as SUCCESSFUL PRODUCT DELIVERY - THE KEY TO THE “HOLDING BASE” BUSINESS MODEL APPROACH as well as documented in the "Holding Base" Conceptual Organizational Chart. The only business-related activity that will actually be carried out by Conservery, apart from operating the “Holding Base” business model, will be root cause/efficiency evaluations as documented by the fact that that activity was never included in the items offered for sale along with the Conservery assets as indicated in the post THE SALE OF CONSERVERY'S ASSETS - UPDATED, even though no sale took place and furthermore, neither were the rights to its predecessor Blog (SociAllMedia Issues) offered to be conveyed in the sale. The applicable Permit will be amended when such activities are being carried out again as required, since the current Permit only allows for an office for funds owed to be collected.

    Part 2 is included below:

    ReplyDelete
  5. Part 1 is Above:

    Part 2
    Being subjected to highly unethical and questionable treatment at the “hands” of those obviously with little regard for the rights of other should not be condoned apparently because only a section of the business expansion is slated to be carried out in Iowa, that has imped my Proprietorship from carrying out its inteded funcftion for, whuch it was reestablished, namely collecting funds owed me doing business as Conservery. As an individual with the same rights as any other to conduct business actiuvity, wherever it is deemed most appropriate for such to be conducted, I am forced to make plans accordigly. For example, how could I in good conscience, conclude that it’s a sound business decision to expand all my Proprietorship’s business activities in a liocation where its impossible to receive ALL mail intended for my business, the very reason the office was reestablished in its current location. THE OFFICE WAS NOT RE-ESTABLISHED TO RECEIVE MEDICAL BILLS FOR AN EX SPOUSE, PROPORTING TO BE CONNECTED TO THE PROPRIETIORSHIP, BEING SUPPORTED BY OTHERS ALSO WITH NO FACTUAL CONNECTION TO MY PROPRIETORSHIP, AND NONE POSSESSING ANY LEGAL BASIS FOR SUCH POSITIONS, With these circumstsnces existing, how could any concrete plans be made for this location and any activity likewise be supported under these circumstances? With these conditions existing, the plans drawn up now calls for partial expansion in iowa and additional expansion outside Iowa, with a resumption of the root cause/efficiency evaluations when normal operating conditions are allowed to take place for my Proprietorship, a right ALL are entitled to. It is because, I did not want to completely abandon the State alltogether, [or blame all for the actions of possiblly just a “few” with the ability to circumvent Processes (Agencies) intended to provide the same services for ALL], a portion of the expansion will be carried out in Iowa and a portion outside of Iowa as previously indicated, especially since I am an international citizen, and wanting to cast your state in the best possible “light”, but unable to due so due to the actions of perhaps just a few, who may not even be from Iowa.
    With regards your permitting process, even though the scenario only applied to the Conservery Proprietorship, none of the Permits were completed to avoid conveying improper information since the expansion of ALL is depended on the funds receive from ONE, I hope your (State) Proocess allows for extenuating circumstances such as described here, in order that overall progress is not impeded by those with such objectives and giving your State, a negative light as a result, Please indicate how those processes that are intended to function for ALL can be made to function for me in order to conduct business effectively as well as any other legal resident as guaranteed by the Constitution (as well as State Law)?


    Respectfully James F. Brazant
    Proprietor
    Conservery/Cosvry/ClChs Bakery
    6/27/2015
    (see the Conservery Blog Page for the Proprietorship’s new mailing address)
    Please Note: the most updated form of all comments as well as available links and photos, etc., are on the COMMENTS (2015) Page.
    art

    ReplyDelete
  6. This Comment is an Amendment to the two (2) comment above again displaying email communication with the Sate of Iowa Department of Revenue clarifying details generally regarding the structure od ClChs Bakery.

    Gmail From: James F Brazant
    Re: March, 2015 Iowa Withholding Tax Quarterly Returns for Conservery, Cosvry & ClChs Bakery - Follow-up/Amendment
    James F Brazant Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:25 AM
    To: Iowa Department of Revenue

    This amendment to the previous email update of all the email content is intended to emphasize that ClChs Bakery is not intended to be operated as a subsidiary proprietorship in the "Holding Base" model approach, but as a completely separate proprietorship and ONLY as mobile operations in two different locations.

    Respectfully ,
    James F. Brazant
    Proprietor
    Conservery/Cosvry/ClChs Bakery
    6/28/2015
    (see the Conservery Blog Page for the Proprietorship’s new mailing address)
    Please Note: the most updated form of all comments as well as available links and photos, etc., are on the COMMENTS (2015) Page.

    ReplyDelete